RE(2): Echoplex memory mess...

["Claude Lassonde" <classonde@psbgm.qc.ca>]

What a mess... The service people at the company should post comments over
here to sort things out... Any Gibson-Oberheim-Echoplex tech around?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas Lawrence [mailto:douglas-lawrence@home.com]
> Sent: dimanche, aožt 09, 1998 01:44
> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> Subject: RE: Echoplex memory
>
>
> My Echoplex is now back at Oberheim being checked out for the
> same reasons.
> I haven't heard back from them what the problem was.
>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Marc Roche [mailto:govinda@cyber-dyne.com]
> >>Sent: Saturday, August 08, 1998 10:16 PM
> >>To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> >>Subject: Re: Echoplex memory
> >>
> >>
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>I just sent my new (7/1) EDP back to Oberheim yesterday.  Tried
> >>two different
> >>batches of simms from two different retailers and neither of them
> >>worked (the
> >>unit worked fine with the supplied 50secs of memory).  Could I
> >>have been so
> >>unlucky as to get bad simms twice?  Hope to be getting an answer soon.
> >>Kim Flint wrote:
> >>
> >>> It works with parity or non-parity simms, and it doesn't matter
> >>if you mix
> >>> them or max the memory or whatever. (the parity bit is
> >>ignored.) That's in
> >>> the echoplex FAQ on the LD website. The problems a few people
> >>had seemed to
> >>> be from some bad batch of simms, and nobody has reported
> >>anything like it
> >>> since. In general it's always worked fine with any type simm
> >>out there, and
> >>> there isn't any known problem with fully loaded memory. I've
> heard that
> >>> reported a couple times and it always turned out to be
> >>something else. (like
> >>> a bad simm...)
> >>>
> >>> kim
>