Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Boomerang and DL4 - URL to DL4 docs???



Nevermind...found it.
-----Original Message-----
To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com>
Date: Thursday, October 14, 1999 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: Boomerang and DL4 - URL to DL4 docs???


>What's the URL to the DL4 docs? I couldn't find it
>anywhere on the Line6 site.
>
>thanks
>
>Larry
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Weideman, Gary L (Gary) <weideman@lucent.com>
>To: 'Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com' <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com>
>Date: Thursday, October 14, 1999 12:00 PM
>Subject: RE: Boomerang and DL4
>
>
>>Matt,
>>
>>Thanks for the response. Do you (or anyone else) know what the sampling
>rate
>>is the the DL4 ?? I'm wondering if it is close to a JamMan or EP or lower
>>like the Rang. I would like to get a looper that is at least as good as
the
>>JamMan since I'm playing acoustic guitar and want the loop sample to be
>>pretty good.
>>
>>Thanks in advance
>>
>>G. Weideman
>>
>>> ----------
>>> From: Matthias Grob[SMTP:matthias@grob.org]
>>> Reply To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 10:34 PM
>>> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
>>> Subject: RE: Boomerang and DL4
>>>
>>> >I've heard from another local music store that the DL4 is coming the
end
>>> of
>>> >the month.
>>> >
>>> >I printed out the DL4 manual from Line6's website. It appears that the
>>> pedal
>>> >is 24-bit from the documentation although I'm not sure  if that
>literally
>>> >means that the sampling rate is 24-bit for the looper, can anyone
>confirm
>>> >that ?
>>>
>>> dont worry about this too much. The converter is not 24bits anyway, and
>>> its
>>> quality cannot be expressed in bits really. Even 16bit converters
usually
>>> dont use the last bit truely.
>>> The processor calculates in 24 or 32bits internally. This is a must and
>>> does not say anything either.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>          ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>