] [Thread Prev
Re: reaktor, MSP, etc
>I've said it before, but Digital Performer is *1* feature away from
>being one of the most amazing loopers out there. If only there was
>public outcry for them to add a feedback control to POLAR I would
>probably sell my Repeater in a heartbeat.
well, its a completely different structure. Its samples. There is no
feedback. So its not just the control for the feedback that lacks.
And there are still a lot of other good features that Polar has less
than the Repeater, no?
>On Saturday, August 23, 2003, at 03:22 PM, Kim Flint wrote:
>>At 10:49 AM 8/23/2003, Mark Sottilaro wrote:
>>> There have recently been a few posts about what Reaktor 4 can do
>>>and it sounds amazingly promising.
>>So for years now I've been hearing about all the potential and
>>promise of Reaktor for creating loopers. Even more years for
>>I'm still waiting.
>>Every looper I've seen created in these was really limited and
>>basically didn't go beyond looping functions from 30 years ago.
>>User interfaces were poorly thought out or non-existent. Features
>>are incomplete and not fully fleshed out. Is this promise ever
>>going to be realized, or is this just a nice fantasy that's never
>>going to come true?
>>Please, somebody show me one really good, modern looper created this way.
>>Kim Flint | Looper's Delight
>>email@example.com | http://www.loopers-delight.com