[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: reaktor, MSP, etc

>I've said it before, but Digital Performer is *1* feature away from 
>being one of the most amazing loopers out there.  If only there was 
>public outcry for them to add a feedback control to POLAR I would 
>probably sell my Repeater in a heartbeat.

well, its a completely different structure. Its samples. There is no 
feedback. So its not just the control for the feedback that lacks.
And there are still a lot of other good features that Polar has less 
than the Repeater, no?

>Mark Sottilaro
>On Saturday, August 23, 2003, at 03:22 PM, Kim Flint wrote:
>>At 10:49 AM 8/23/2003, Mark Sottilaro wrote:
>>>   There have recently been a few posts about what Reaktor 4 can do 
>>>and it sounds amazingly promising.
>>So for years now I've been hearing about all the potential and 
>>promise of Reaktor for creating loopers. Even more years for 
>>I'm still waiting.
>>Every looper I've seen created in these was really limited and 
>>basically didn't go beyond looping functions from 30 years ago. 
>>User interfaces were poorly thought out or non-existent. Features 
>>are incomplete and not fully fleshed out. Is this promise ever 
>>going to be realized, or is this just a nice fantasy that's never 
>>going to come true?
>>Please, somebody show me one really good, modern looper created this way.
>>Kim Flint                     | Looper's Delight
>>kflint@loopers-delight.com    | http://www.loopers-delight.com


          ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org