] [Thread Prev
Re: reaktor, MSP, etc
yeah, totally seamless.
On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, at 09:49 AM, nathan pease wrote:
> that's a good question. I'll have to load up the 'ol patch tonight
> and check it out to be sure.
> In the meantime, I'll say I *think* I could do what you're asking.
> I've managed to set it up so that I don't get problems with
> clicks/gaps while I play grooves (fwiw I'm a bass player), and I must
> end up playing over the bar line (and that is to say, the record end
> point) sometimes - even on the initial pass. Also, thinking about the
> way it works it shouldn't be a problem: it writes values in a buffer
> up to the very last sample position and then writes the next value
> into the first sample position and continues writing samples over the
> now existing buffer. when it plays back it draws from the last sample
> and the first sample the later immediately after the former, same as
> it was recorded. Provided there's no pause or glitch on either record
> or playback, there should be no problem. Provided that theory is
> correct, it's all a matter of design after that.
> I'll test the theory tonight.
> On Tuesday, August 26, 2003, at 01:30 AM, SoundFNR@aol.com wrote:
>> thanks for that Nathan,
>> is that totally seamless though?
>> i.e. you keep playing a sustained note while hitting the
>> "ends record and leaves the looper in overdub" button,
>> and on playback there's no gap/click in the note.
>> sorry, have to ask
>> andy butler
>>> I've done this in max/msp. it could be left in overdub after setting
>>> the loop's end point or not depending on how the program ("patch")
>>> set up. if I was so inclined I could set up 2 buttons, one that
>>> record and leaves the looper in overdub, and one that takes it out