[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: Defining "pro"

Title: RE: Defining "pro"

it's o-o-o-only talk.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Echevarria [mailto:sean.loop@creepingfog.com]
Sent: 19 October 2005 20:47
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Subject: Re: Defining "pro"

Elephant talk...

At 2005.10.19 12:44 PM, S V G wrote:
>      And on the "Pro" vs. "Semi-Pro" vs. "amateur" topic, Robert has been
> able to continually do
>his music based on some wise real-estate investments many years ago.  This
>by definition takes him
>out of the "Pro" category.  It's all just talk...


The contents of this e-mail are confidential to the ordinary user
of the e-mail address to which it was addressed, and may also
be privileged. If you are not the addressee of this e-mail you may
not copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it
in any form whatsoever.If you have received this e-mail in error,
please e-mail the sender by replying to this message.

It is your responsibility to carry out appropriate virus and other
checks to ensure that this message and any attachments do not
affect your systems / data. Any views or opinions expressed in this
e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of MTV Networks Europe unless specifically stated,
nor does this message form any part of any contract unless so stated.

MTV reserves the right to monitor e-mail communications from
external/internal sources for the purposes of ensuring correct
and appropriate use of MTV communication equipment.

MTV Networks Europe