] [Thread Prev
> here in the US, we're stuck with 60 Hz
> hum, annoyingly close to (but not quite in tune with) Bb.
Actually, it's 51 cents sharp of Bb, 49 cents flat of B. Close
enough that I used to use 60
cycle wall current hum to tune a second piano in a quarter-tone
relationship to a normal piano
tuned to A=440.
> I have a theory
> that fluorescent light would look much more natural if a second bulb
> be used , driven by a somehow-filtered AC/mains circuit to achieve the
> tritone of 60 Hz (is that 90 Hz?). The light generated at the tritone
> have frequency characteristics to compliment the 60 Hz light and take
> that wicked too-red emphasis that 60 Hz fluorescence has.
90 Hz to 60 Hz is the ratio 3/2, otherwise known as a perfect fifth.
84 Hz would get you
much closer to a tritone. Though I don't understand what you are
referring to well enough to know
if it would alter the "too-red emphasis" or not. In my understanding,
fluorescent light is harsh
because it's made up of a pulse wave turning the light on and off rapidly.
Incadescent light is
more akin to analog waveforms like triangle waves.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
- Re: G
- From: mark sottilaro <email@example.com>