Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Headset mic



Okay, I have both a new Sure SM10A and my trusty SM57 sitting here right in front of me with specs. And I also just tested them on my laptop system. I have to say, I'm not sure where the negative comments are coming from, because based on my test if anyone hates the SM10A, they must also hate the SM57, because I really can't tell the difference. The 57 seems to have just a little bit more high end, which is reflected in the spec comparisons below. The graphics of the frequency responses both show a relatively flat response between 200 hz and 20K. The 57 has some peaks after this that account for it having a bit brigher repsonse than the 10A.  And of course, the 57's range starts at 40hz and the 10A at 50.
 
However, I do have a theory as to why someone would compare the SM10A with a mic like the SM57 and say that the former sounds bad. First, the SM10A is a close-talk mic, and the frequency response is stated at a distance 8mm. Now, of course, if I place the SM57 only 8mm away from my mouth, then of course, it's totally freakin' loud and fuller. However, when you read the manual of the SM57, the recommended distance for voice is 25mm. And it is at this distance that I can't tell a lot of difference between the SM57 and the SM10A.  So, I'm guessing that those who don't like the SM10A either didn't have it close enough to their mouth to get the stated frequency repsonse, and/or when they were comparing it to a hand held mic with a similar frequency repsonse, they had the thing almost touching their mouth, in which case I can understand the discrepancies.
 
Moreover, I'm totally happy with the mic for experimental vocal looping and laptop processing. I'm rather glad that it's response is somewhat flat between 200hz and 2K. I'd rather add booming lows and sizzling highs myelf for this type of music and application, rather than having the mic do that for me. And I am able to do this with this mic.
 
SM57
Frequency response (at 8mm): 40 to 15,000 Hz
Graphic of frequency reponse:
http://www.shure.com/stellent/groups/public/@gms_gmi_web_us/documents/web_resource/site_img_us_rc_sm57_large.gif
 
SM10A
Frequency response (at 8mm): 50 to 15,000 Hz
Graphic of frequency reponse: Inside user guide here, http://www.shure.com/stellent/groups/public/@gms_gmi_web_ug/documents/web_resource/us_pro_sm10a_ug.pdf
 
 
 
Kris
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "bill bigrig" <billbigrig@yahoo.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: Headset mic

> Howdy,
>
> General comments, yes. Eq, good luck, a 15 band
> minimum for 1 microphone might do the trick. Channel
> eq just didn't seem to have enough control.
> Rig
>
>
> --- Krispen Hartung <
khartung@cableone.net> wrote:
>
>> Wow...some negative comments on this setup from Rick
>> and Bill.
>>
>> Nothing that some decent EQ can't fix. The specs
>> don't look that bad. I plan
>> to get one anyway. I've used them before, with
>> decent results. I'm just
>> using it for experimental vocal processing into my
>> laptop and
>> max/msp....nothing remotely close to vocal looping
>> or typical rock/pop
>> vocals.  I think it will be fine, really.
>>
>> All mids, no treble or bass? Come on....no treble or
>> no bass? Is this a
>> generalization?
>>
>> Kris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Howdy,
>> >
>> > The first band i worked in bought an sm-10 for the
>> > drummer. STAY AWAY!!! all mids, no treble or bass.
>> > Rig
>> >
>> >
>> > --- Krispen Hartung <
khartung@cableone.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> And how does it compare to the Sure?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
http://www.shure.com/ProAudio/Products/WiredMicrophones/us_pro_SM10A-CN_content
>> >>
>> >> I am thinking of getting this one, because it has
>> >> been compared with the
>> >> SM58, which I'm fond of.
>> >>
>> >> Kris
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Qua Veda" <
qua@oregon.com>
>> >> To: <
Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
>> >> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 5:21 PM
>> >> Subject: Headset mic
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Hi Stefan,
>> >> > You mentioned you are using an AudioTechnica
>> >> headset mic.  Sounds like a
>> >> > very convenient mic that frees up your hands to
>> >> operate faders, play
>> >> > instruments etc.
>> >> >
>> >> > Can you elaborate on your use of the mic?
>> Model #
>> >> of the mic,  how it
>> >> > sounds compared to other popular vocal mics,
>> >> feedback rejection etc ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> > -Qua
>> >> >
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: Stefan Tiedje
>> >> [mailto:Stefan-Tiedje@addcom.de]
>> >> > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 2:37 PM
>> >> > To:
Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>> >> > Subject: Re: POST YOUR SETUP
>> >> >
>> >> > Michael Peters schrieb:
>> >> >> :-)  very simple. I've grown too old to
>> schlepp
>> >> tons of gear.
>> >> >
>> >> > Yeah, mine fits into a small rucksack: 12"
>> >> Powerbook running Max/MSP, Esi
>> >> > Quatafire 610, up to three fader boxes (Fostex
>> >> MixTAB, Doepfer PocketFader
>> >> > and PocketDial), Yamaha CBX K1 mini keyboard -
>> all
>> >> fed by an AudioTechnica
>> >> > headset, eventually some additional Mics. For
>> >> "bigger"
>> >> > sets I can throw in a Peavey RQ 200 Mixer (the
>> >> smallest mixer I know with
>> >> > 16
>> >> > inputs, 6 of them mic ins...)
>> >> >
>> >> > Sound sources include, beside my voice, plastic
>> >> water bottles and Tibetan
>> >> > bowls...
>> >> >
>> >> > Stefan
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
>> >> > --_____-----------|--------------
>> >> > --(_|_ ----|\-----|-----()-------
>> >> > -- _|_)----|-----()--------------
>> >> > ----------()--------www.ccmix.com
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>> > Need a vacation? Get great deals
>> > to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
>> >
http://travel.yahoo.com/
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>      ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Shape Yahoo! in your own image.  Join our Network Research Panel today!  
http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
>
>
>