Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: First Loop Sync



Not sure I understand the Punch in / out advice you gave me.
Would you mind explaining it again?
Thanks

On Aug 22, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Per Boysen wrote:

> On 22 aug 2007, at 13.24, jnd wrote:
>
>> Hi Per
>>
>> First of all thanks again for sharing your knowledge....
>>
>> So i have got augustus and live running....augustus as sync master  
>> for live.  And with this the problem of synchronization is solved.
>> But the Augustus Freeze Loop button gets me nuts. Because I have  
>> to hit it at the exact point where the loop begins. Is there  
>> anyway around this?
>
>
> I used to hit the Freeze Loop button after I had played something  
> into the loop but before I would play something that I did not want  
> to go into the loop. Using the Freeze Loop button works best with  
> loop input knob set to full input.
>
> Another approach is to target the input level. This gives:
> Input Knob Level set to full   = Overdub Mode
> Input Knob Level set to zero = Playback Mode
>
> A third trick is the Puch In function (se my earlier post)
>
>
>> As you advice i am studying SooperLooper. But I hanven't found out  
>> a way to have the output of each lop on sooperlooper in diferent  
>> live tracks. Could you help me out on this one?
>
> Hm... Please forgive me if I'm mistaken (since I'm only looping in  
> Mobius at the moment) but I think you have two choices with  
> SooperLooper.
>
> 1) Run it as the standalone looper. This requires the Jack Utility  
> on Mac and Linux. You can open more loops and set them to sync to  
> the first loop. I'm not sure if each loop delivers a unique output  
> to Jack. You'd better check this with the sours (SL manual or SL  
> mailing list).
>
> 2) Open several instances of SooperLooper. Since you open these  
> parallel instances on exclusive Audio Tracks they already are on  
> separated outputs. Hence no need for an additional routing.
>
> Greetings from Sweden
>
> Per Boysen
> www.boysen.se (Swedish)
> www.looproom.com (international)
>
>
>
>