Re: The loop effect I'm wanting today: A smart replace

[Grant <grantmepeace@mindspring.com>]

Couldn't you just arm the first loop to end when it's finished and arm a 
second loop to start recording when the first loop ends as well? Once the 
second loop is created you could begin overdubs and feedback would not 
need to be changed at all (always set to 100%). Wouldn't that work?

G




-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Hamburg <mark@grubmah.com>
>Sent: Aug 14, 2010 2:14 PM
>To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>Subject: The loop effect I'm wanting today: A smart replace
>
>Here is what I find myself wanting today. I don't think either the EDP or 
>the Looperlative can be readily programmed to do just this. I think of 
>this as being essentially smart replace.
>
>Tap pedal and it goes into "replace" mode. The old loop plays through but 
>does so at 0% feedback so that it won't repeat again.
>
>One cycle later relative to the initial tap it switches automatically to 
>100% overdub so that the new loop can end up seamless.
>
>Tap the pedal again and it stops recording but stays at 100% feedback.
>
>The tricky part relative to existing loopers is the automatic switch from 
>0% feedback to full feedback at the one cycle mark. If one gave up on the 
>ability to tap at arbitrary times, then it might be possible to achieve 
>this with a quantized sequence of operations.
>
>Does anyone know of something that will do this?
>
>Mark
>