Re: Wanted: Simple Multiple Sample Playback Software

[mark francombe <mark@markfrancombe.com>]

me too...

Im pretty sure they are basically simerlar...  maybe it depends on which one you start on? I have dipped into Bidule many times... and dipped out again, wheas AM seemed like a breeze, and had exactly the level of complexity I needed for what I needed to achive, whease Bidule always seems TOO deep, and like I had to spend time building my tool from scratch.

No however, Im really a bit into software and am dying to get some time away from SoftStep troubles to build some realy complicated and unfeasably strange things in Bidule, that are probably NOT achievable in AM. 


M

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Gareth Whittock <buddhamachine@live.co.uk> wrote:

I think it depends on your mindset. I found Bidule unusably complex but took to AM straight away. Horses for courses and all that..

Peace

G

> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:35:57 +0000
> From: akbutler@tiscali.co.uk
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Subject: Re: Wanted: Simple Multiple Sample Playback Software

>
> hows that different to "complicated" Bidule?
>
> mark francombe wrote:
> > Thats why I mention Audio Mulch... Is simple
> > 1. drag a file player (or loop player) into the patching window
> > 2. connect wires to output (investigate a mixer at this stage if you will)
> > 3. Open Parameter Control window (Here you connect stuff up to hardware)
> > 4. Select the "Active" Parameter for the File player (Dont know what
> > they dont call it "PLAY") and midi learn.
> > 5. Hit yer thing... I tested with a keyboard... Which is nice cos a
> > different ket can launch a different clip
> > 6. Do yer gig
>

-- 
mark francombe
www.markfrancombe.com
www.ordoabkhao.com
twitter @markfrancombe

http://vimeo.com/user825094
http://www.looop.no