[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: new sustainiac sustainer
Hi Gary,
Thanks for your reply.
Since you now have the attention of a significant number of folks on our
mailing list, would you mind giving us a more detailed description by
email? Or perhaps placing your brochure on a web site? I think it would be
most appreciated, since the subject of sustain devices has come up a number
of times on the Looper's Delight list. I'm not time-endowed enough to
forward hardcopy literature back to the net, or I'd take you up on the
brochure offer.
thanks,
kim
At 10:32 PM -0500 5/6/97, Gary Osborne wrote:
>Our new sustainer is built in like your Fernandes but our middle pickup is
>the driver instead of the neck pickup. This lets you use the neck pickup
>while the sustainer is on. That's something the Fernandes can't do.
>Send
>us your snail mail address to get a free brochure. Gary O.
>
>----------
>> From: Kim Flint <kflint@annihilist.com>
>> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
>> Cc: Gary Osborne <maniac@inetdirect.net>
>> Subject: Re: new sustainiac sustainer
>> Date: Tuesday, May 06, 1997 2:49 AM
>>
>> >Just thought you would like to know that Maniac Music has recently
>> >introduced a new and improved Sustainiac in-guitar sustainer. We have
>been
>> >working on it for about 6 years and it blows away the earlier units.
>Drop
>> >us a line if you want more info.
>> >
>> >Gary Osborne
>> >Maniac Music, Inc.
>> >8320 Meadowbrook Drive
>> >Indpls, IN 46240
>> >
>> >317-259-8295
>> >
>> >maniac@inetdirect.net
>>
>>
>> ok, I'm game. Tell me more!
>>
>> I bought a fernandes sustainer pickup for $300 a year or so ago. The
>pickup
>> even came with a so-so strat copy attached to it! ;-)
>>
>> I like the fernandes thingy pretty well. Makes a great sound source for
>> loops. How does the new Sustainiac compare to that? What I remember
>about
>> the old sustainiac is that it required external hardware and some large
>> device connected to the headstock of the guitar. Hopefully you've
>improved
>> on that design approach?
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> kim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> Kim Flint | Looper's Delight
>> kflint@annihilist.com | http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html
>> http://www.annihilist.com/ | Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com
>>
>>
______________________________________________________________________
Kim Flint | Looper's Delight
kflint@annihilist.com | http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html
http://www.annihilist.com/ | Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com