[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: New Ideas for Loop-boxes: Wishes and Dreams Department.
David Kirkdorffer did a major contribution:
>Kim & Loop-Folk
:-) here they would say Loop-tribe
>Picking up on the idea -- how about adding a special page to the
>LOOPERS-DELIGHT Web-page capturing these ideas in an ongoing basis?
Wow, Loopist dreams.
Engineers just have to select some items to bring out new technology.
Fascinating.
>1. Visual reference points for where one is in a loop.
> a) a waveshape would be an excelent visual representation
> b) a kind of LCD "time-o-meter" spining one revolution/loop
>(like divers' watches with all those fancy dials)
you want a computer, really... or would you really look at such design in a
one unit LCD? Or did you think of a 2 unit high machine? nono!
>- sometimes it can be quite difficult to know where one is in a long
>loop.
>- it would help time placement of "new additions" and multiples...and
>general "situational -- "where am I?"" needs...
>- and maybe with two colours: Red for "that which has RECENTLY been
>added" and Green for "that which has already been added"
Once we go there, we might as well have a separate channel for each
recording.
>2. Manipulation of end-to-end connect points... Open Loop / Close Loop
>- imagne a 10 second loop. Then imagine connecting two points within
>that 10 seconds to create a newer shorter loop.
>
> 10 sec. loop: aa(start)> bb> cc> dd> ee> ff> gg> hh>
>ii> jj> kk(end)> --->> aa> bb> etc
> new shorter loop: dd(newstart)> ee> ff> gg(newend)> -->
>dd> ee> ff> etc.
>
> and then connecting from cc> to hh>... etc.
>
>I'm half sure someone will tell me this is already available -- if only
>I knew how....
For the reduction its simply Multiply. After you reduced, its a bit
complicated to go back to the entire, but its possible, either with
Multiply - Undo or with NextMultiply (the reduced version was done with
NextMulti).
Or did I get you wrong?
>4 Tie-ins with all new the hard-disk recording gear
>- may be helpful for loop-"boxes" to stay in the market...
>- to create "an Easy Sample-Builder" capability for studios and midi
>minded folk.
Yes, I am trying to do this for many years, but so far, the idea was hard
to come through, and the comercial success of looping gear was not
convincing.
>7. More versatile input sensitivity
In what sense? More sensitive to connect a microphone? The LOOP delay had
that.
>10. Leds/lights on the Oberheim foot-controller
>- For live performance, I'm not always close enough to my rack to see
>what's lit-up. But I am close to the foot controller.
Would be nice really. We thought the user could not afford it...