[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
RE: a woman's ears
Kim illumined:
>Just so's you know.....As I understand the physiological issue, it's >not
volume or high frequencies that cause the discomfort in women. >It's
particular
types of non-harmonic distortion in the audio system, >which will tend to
be
worse at higher volume. I've seen several >discussions of this in audio
engineering journals, usually under the >context of how to get a wider
customer
base for audio products.
Hmmm. This is really interesting. What are these types of n-h distortion
called? (So I can find out more about this.) Also, a question comes to
mind
regarding human sensitivity in detecting distortion. Assuming we're
talking
about musicians or people with well-trained, discriminating hearing: is
there
inharmonic distortion occurring below the range of conscious perception
that
affects us negatively before we actually are aware of hearing it? Might I
start feeling uncomfortable before I am able to consciously identify this
type
of distortion, even if I was somehow miraculously blessed with a superbly
sophisticated ear? (My question comes in part from reading about phase
distortion in amplifiers or equalizers. My text source tells me the
associated
slight reduction of response is generally not noticeable. Does it,
however,
have any measurable effect on the listener, even when not audibly
perceived?)
I'm also curious about lab standards by which something as subjective as
perception is meaningfully quantified. Can anyone recommend a good source
for
info on that one?
>These inharmonic distortions add frequency components to the >sound in a
particular way that women tend to have a negative >reaction to while men
typically don't notice.
Sarajane's post mentioned differences in inner ear structure between
genders.
Is that the mechanism in this case?
>It is very common with cheap home/audio stereos, cheap PA >systems, cheap
music gear, etc. It also happens in more expensive >gear that isn't
designed
very well. As the volume is turned up on these >systems, the distortions
start
to happen, and women will start to find it >unpleasant for physiological
reasons. On cleaner systems that don't >generate these distortions, the
discomfort doesn't happen.
[snip]
On a few occasions, the systems were pretty clean, high end. On the other
hand, as I recall, I wasn't necessarily the only one suffering; some of
the
boyz were also getting blasted. Which probably just means that those of
us
copping to pain weren't trying to be as macho, we hadn't already toasted
our
eardrums, or we simply weren't as hell-bent on vaporizing ourselves out of
existence...
Maybe it's just a difference in individual thresholds. I've run across a
very
few musicians who consistently choose to play at *significantly* higher
volumes
than most (regardless of gender), yet have no detectable hearing loss
after
years and years of totally cranking their systems, and practically
stuffing 10
inch speakers in their ears. (They also manage to drive everybody else on
stage totally nuts!) -- And hey, talk about incompatibilities in a
relationship... ;-)
Anyway, thanks for the clarification, Kim. Very useful info.
laurie
>From lists@slip.net Mon Mar 09 12:30:47 1998