[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
ASR-X Pro vs. MPC2000
Well, I was just about to buy an Akai MPC2000 (v1.7 OS has seemed to fix
most of the stability issues), then Ensoniq announced the ASR-X Pro (the
red
box). It seems like they've addressed almost everybody's major complaints
except the small screen issue and real-time sample stretch. Can anyone
point
out any compelling reason to go with one over the other. To me, it seems
like the ASR-X Pro is a winner ... (has anybody heard anything about
Yamaha's up-and-coming competitor to these units, I think it's called the
RU700?? It's due to be released this Fall.)
Feature MPC2000 ASR-X Pro
=====================================================
Flash OS yes yes(finally)
Polyphony 32 32
# channels Rx 1 32 16
# channels Tx 32 16
Sequencer Tracks 64 16
MIDI outs 2 1
Max audio outs 2 2
RAM 2mb (32 max) 2mb (66 max)
Total sample time ??? 13 minutes @ 44.1
kHz mono
6.5 minutes @ 44.1
kHz stereo
ROM sounds no yes (even more
with EXP expansion board)
Storage floppy, SCSI floppy, SCSI (built-in now)
SMPTE yes no
# Pads 16 13 (plus 10 quick edit
pads)
Graphic editing yes no
Step edit yes no
read PC (fat) disks yes yes
Effects Algoritms ?? with add-in 40
Effects Busses 4 busses 2 busses
Resonant filter 12db/Oct LP Multimode (LP, BP Resonant)
Track muting yes no
Sequencer memory 100,000 notes 140,000 notes (w/ 8Mb RAM)
Save File Formats .WAV & .AIFF .AIFF
CC modulation yes(effects only) yes(4 per patch)
Time Stretch yes yes
Tempo Resolution ??? 1/100 BPM
Clock Resolution 96/ppq 384/ppq
Tap Tempo yes yes
Note Repeat yes(easy) (???) I think so
with some playing around
Velocity sensitive pads no yes
Hmmmm, I wonder how these units compare to a Yamaha A3000 or an Emu
ESI-4000
... if I could find a great pad based MIDI controller, that may be a better
way to go.
Later-
Doug.