Re: echoplex or jamman?

["Dennis W. Leas" <dennis@mdbs.com>]

Hoover Alan wrote:
> 
> You're right about the tambourine dynamic range, Kim.  What's more,
> tamborine is RICH in frequencies above 20 Khz, all the way to the 50 KHz
> range.  This will get past the anti-aliasing filters, rendering them less
> effective.  So, in addition to compressing the tambourine, heavy 
>filtering
> of the highs above 15Khz (or compressing those highs) would possibly 
>help.
> This is one of those special cases where higher digital sampling 
>frequency
> would be of great advantage.

Thanks for this information.  It occurs to me that maybe I should just use 
a really cheap mic. ;)

- Dennis Leas
-- 
dennis@mdbs.com