[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: Digital Answering Machine
Butt loopers to depraved answering machines, it's all right here, folks. I
love it.
Mark, you've reminded me of something I've been meaning to post to the
list,
a cool and sick effect that not everyone might have discovered. It's the
only reason I haven't kicked my answering machine's sorry little backside
out the door.
On my box (Lucent Technologies), the obnoxious pre-recorded date/time
headless talker will do a great stutter. (Where *do* they get these
voices?) Anyway, here's how, according to the functions on my machine:
Crank up the volume. Then hit the "change" button (it's the general change
program function switch). Next hit "clock", or whatever will access
date/time settings. The Voice comes up with the day of the week. Keep
scrolling through the menu by hitting change/clock and you successively get
the hour and minutes. Whenever you're within one function, i.e. minutes,
fast-tapping "skip" enables a rapid scroll to the correct number. So
here's
the kicker: IMHO, the best stutter is when the Voice is moving through the
high minutes, 20's through 50's -- timing of the "skip" tap is everything,
try different tempos. My favorite number is zero: the dude says "oh oh oh
oh oh..." (as in twelve oh-one, twelve oh-two, etc.) This is hilarious! (I
need to get a life, huh?)
Re the fundamental problem of sucking sound quality: how about some of you
hardware geniuses rigging your mini-disc player as a message machine?
Bottle that, retire next year.
Another chick on the list,
Laurie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Kata [mailto:MKata@Wintegrity.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 3:42 AM
> To: Loopers Delight
> Subject: Digital Answering Machine
>
>
> I recently bought a new answering machine that records messages with very
> poor sound quality. It seems to have a noise gate that cuts off
> words that
> aren't spoken loudly enough. Needless to say, I replaced it with a
>better
> model.
>
> Is there some way that I can use the digital recording mechanism as a
> looper in my guitar rig?
>
> Mark Kata
>
>
>