Re: Boycott Gibson, not everyone

[Neal Trembath <ntrembat@statsol.com>]

Yes, let's hope that Gibson, despite its lack of Vision, parts out and
allows sublicensing of its properties--perhaps allow it to loop back to
the interest of its progtenitor.  That's the MAX I guess we can expect.
"Dave, are you there?  help me, Dave....  Daisy, Daisy..."

On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Matthias Grob wrote:
> 
> I am mainly concerned about MAX which is a unique product with great 
>future
> (maybe not comercially, but for creativity). I hope someone takes that 
>over.

> >I've heard that the turnover among Gibson executives may be as high
> >as 75% a year.  Forget warm and fuzzy; is that a healthy, normal,
> >capitalistic business?
> 
> Horrible really, a tremendous waist of learning time, disrespecting the
> human needs to develop methods, work spaces and colaboration with 
>colegues.
> Constancy seams to have no value in this system - I hope this failure is
> not deadly for the system...