Re: vortex memory upgrade?

["Tom Lambrecht" <hideo@concentric.net>]

oh, MAN . . .

that raises an ugly thought to be thunk . . .

are my microprocessor loopers Y2K compliant?

OOOOOHHHHHHHHH . . .


Tom Lambrecht
hideo@concentric.net
-----Original Message-----
From: jdurant <jdurant@alchemyrecords.com>
To: Loopers-Delight <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com>
Date: Thursday, November 18, 1999 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: vortex memory upgrade?


>EEK! My name used in vain!!!
>


SNIP>
>This does not mean that some folks will find away to stuff all kinds of
>memory in there, and it might not even blow up. But I'll wager everything
>I've got left after 12/31/1999 that the software won't recognize it.
>Reversable? Undo? I wouldn't take that chance, unless I wasn't concerned
>about not having a Vortex any more.
>
>jd
>
>>my guess is if it doesn't recognize the extra memory, it will just work
>>like it did before. But it might work, ya never know. It could be they
were
>>just trying to keep the hardware cost down and never did this option, but
>>it's there in the software. Jon Durant would probably know, if he's
>>actually reading this.
>>
>>I don't see why you couldn't reverse the mod if it doesn't work. Just 
>take
>>out the new chips and put the old ones back in.
>
>