[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: another millenium argument



after you have read those read *Atlas Shrugged*  by Ayn Rand.

jd

"Javier Miranda V." wrote:

>         For a very authoritative opinion of the failure of the 
>capitalist system,
> you would like to check these books out:
> *When Corporations Rule the World* by David C. Korten
> *The Post-Corporate World: Life After Capitalism* by David C. Korten
> *Globalizing Civil Society: Reclaiming Our Right to Power (Open Media
> Pamphlet Series, 4)* by David C. Korten
>         You might also like to check this out:
> *Corporate Media and the Threat to Democracy (Open Media Pamphlet 
>Series)*
> by Robert W. McChesney
>         You can pick them up at Amazon or BuyBooks.com.
>         Bottom line:  You are a better idea than capitalism.  But only 
>if you wake
> up in time.
>
>   | -----Original Message-----
>   | From: L Tremblay [mailto:ltct@concentric.net]
>   | Sent: Saturday 27 November 1999 10:44 AM
>   | To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
>   | Subject: Re: another millenium argument
>   |
>   |
>   | If you have a better idea than Capitalism I'd like to hear it.
>   | I'm no fan of McDeath burgers, but don't blame capitalism.
>   | The alternative is waiting in long lines for loaves of bread
>   | or dying in a Socialist/Communist government-induced famine.
>   |
>   | -  Larry
>   |
>   |
>   | >You are absolutely right .There are much better alternatives
>   | (for children
>   | >as well) than eating a poisonous Big Mac in capitalist world 
>kingdom Mc
>   | >Donalds.I am also an outsider!
>   | >
>   | >
>   | >> >I think Greg is speaking from cultural conditioning.  There
>   | is a great
>   | >deal
>   | >> >of tortured and misshapen arguments and notions in the US.  
>Starting
>   | from
>   | >> >thinking that it's cool to use gallons instead of liters,
>   | miles instead
>   | >of
>   | >> >kilometers, and that everybody in the Universe speaks English 
>(Star
>   | >Trek).
>   | >> >Same old argument, what's real?
>   | >
>   | >
>   | >
>   |
>   |