[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Fw: undesired posts and posts of questionable worth
----- Original Message -----
To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: undesired posts
> Sorry you feel that way but
> I didn't subscribe to Bill Fox's email list.
> I shouldn't have to setup rules to block unsolicited email as a result of
> one list subscription.
> If many wrote in favour fine they are entitled to their opinion and what
> goes in their inbox.
> I don't consider it unfriendly, it was meant to be assertive not
unfriendly
> and it was my second request.
> Putting the details in the topic is a good idea giving reader's the
>option
> to read what is of interest or delete.
> See attachment for an example of stuff I can't see the point in sending?
> Steven
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Grob" <matthias@grob.org>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 8:43 AM
> Subject: undesired posts
>
>
> > >Bill Fox,
> > > Can you unsubscribe me from this spam
> > >
> > >I don't live in USA and I don't want to receive this.
> > > 2nd request.
> > >I suscribed to Kims list BUT not yours.
> > >Steven
> >
> > I find this unfriendly, Steven. We discussed it and many wrote in
> > favour to Bills posting.
> > I dont live in US either and there are many anouncements for shows
> > that I could never go, but I still find it interesting to know whats
> > happening.
> >
> > So I find Petr's apology rather unnecessary:
> >
> > >I am sorry if I was crossed over the line. I saw announcements of
> various
> > >gigs on the list many times before, so I did it too. I thought the
line
> is
> > >whether the gig is about looping or not. If I caused "bad taste" to
> anyone,
> > >I apologize.
> >
> > as someone said: Post what you want, but think well about the subject
> > you put so we can select what we are going to read...
> >
> > no violence
> > Matthias
> >
> >
> > ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org
> >
> >
>
I was thinking
I was thinking I was thinking I was thinking
We could loop it
I was thinking I was thinking
We could loop it We could loop it
I was thinking I was thinking
We could loop it I was thinking
I was looping We could think it
I was looping I was looping I was looping
I was loop it I was loop it I was loop it
thinking thinking
looping thinking looping thinking
I was could it I was could it
looping thinking thinking looping
could it could it
I was could it it was could I
I was loop it thinking thinking
loop it loop it could I could I
thinking looping looping could I could I
think it think it looping
looping looping
I was thinking
thinking could I
could I think it
looping thinking
thinking could I
could I loop it
thinking thinking
looping looping
think I think I
loop a looping
think a could I
loop a thinking
I was looping
looping looping
Think a I was
was a thinking
thinking thinking
loop a I was
looping thinking
thinking I was
looping looping
I was looping
thinking thinking
I was
I was I was
loop
I was
looping
I was
thinking
I was
could I could I
thinking
I was
loop
I
think I
was
loop
think
ing
I
was
was
was
was
was
was
loop
loop
loop
think
I
was
think
loop
was
I
think
loop
could
...
...
...
jeff
rich wrote:
>
> >1. graphs
> > -when I feel limited in a particular piece I'll often work from a
>graph.
> >for instance, my ambient project used to play a chart of stock market
> >returns over the past 50 years. very fun! we would "notate" the graph
>with
> >colors for moods (blue=sad, red=intense, green=layered, etc) and
>indicate
> >how long (length of time) each section would roughly take. some great
> >results with this one.
>
> I had a couple of interesting performances a few years ago based on this
> idea. The performance was called Kaballah Clocks and it was a half hour
> piece, based tonally on the 10 'stations' of the mystical Kaballah. Each
> station has a 'color' associated with it. Color resonates at a certain
> light frequency, and we associated those (angstrom?) frequencies with Hz
> frequencies of sound, so each 'station' had a tonal drone that we
> improvised within. Each member of the ensemble had a clock in front of
> them and we played in each 'station' for 3 minutes, and then mutated to
>the
> next, and to the next, culminating at the top station of the Kaballah,
> associated with Brilliant White light.
>
> Definitely a noisy piece, but what a crescendo! We were purely
> improvising, and made no grandiose pretensions about how good the piece
>was
> going to be. Afterwards, though, we had people coming up and saying how
> amazing it was, and that they had drifted off into some state of
>meditation
> during the piece, even though we had not introduced it in any way...it
>just
> was the end of our set.
>
> Super fun and musically/experimentally/spiritually rewarding
>
> rich