Re: mute 1 of many loops, once

["Mike Biffle" <mbiffle@svg.com>]

This actually sounds like the preferred mode to me... 

-Miko

>>> Matthias Grob <matthias@grob.org> 06/02 10:22 AM >>>
>Yes, I have found myself wanting a solution to this situation too.
An
>alternate idea to the new command solution would be that whenever a
muted
>loop is exited, the next time one comes around to it, it would be
>automatically unmuted. Muting it would be by request only
(Next-Mute).

Ok, sounds easy, maybe better to operate since you dont need to 
remember which loop is muted and which not. I think I had it like 
this once and then found it inconsistent in case of not quantized, 
where you dont have time to press Next-Mute. But it still might not 
make sense to come back to a muted loop.

What do other users think of this solution?

>Eric Zang
>www.listen.to/zang 

thats a cool URL!



          ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org