[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
RE: Echoplex=crap for dummies
I gotta say that Kim shows off a reptilian cool here with Italo (talk about
flames!). You Kim are an iceberg of incomprefuckhensible proportions! I
would have lost my cool right off the bat. But not Kim.
Congrats, Kim. You're a gentleman and a scholar. Not at all bad for a
shorty.
Hmm... Maybe Italo would benefit from a video explaining and demostrating
all the great features of the Echoplex. I'm sure that would shut him up.
J.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Kim Flint [mailto:kflint@loopers-delight.com]
| Sent: Monday 07 August 2000 12:44 AM
| To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
| Subject: Re: Echoplex=crap for dummies
|
|
| At 6:07 PM -0700 8/6/00, italo de angelis wrote:
| >It's almost 4 years that you all guys are pathetically talking
| about this
| >shitty box!!! Can you stop it?
| ...
| >Start writing to Scott Gilfix at Eventide (scottg@eventide.com) to
have
| >properly designed software for looping into their outstanding
| boxes, come
| >ON!!! Fed up with this poor old ladies junk talk be MODERN!!!
| >ITALO
|
| I talked to Scott at length about looping on Orville. It's an
| amazing box
| for signal processing, but you may be interested to know that it has
| fundamental architecture limitations that prevent it from doing
| many of the
| basic functions of the Echoplex. (as I understood it.) It
| doesn't do the
| stuff that is time based and revolves around direct access to
| the data. No
| multiply, no insert, no multiple loops and related functions,
| no multiple
| undo's, limited sync possibilities, etc. It has "sampler mode"
| and "looper
| mode" but can't do the interesting stuff that combines the two
| concepts. If
| you want tons of signal processing power and great algorithms,
| and you want
| to use those in conjunction with basic looping functions (and you have
a
| spare $6000 or whatever it costs) it seems like a pretty good
| choice. Can
| it replace an echoplex? or even a jamman? no. it's a different beast.
|
| kim
|
| ______________________________________________________________________
| Kim Flint | Looper's Delight
| kflint@loopers-delight.com | http://www.loopers-delight.com
|
|
|