Re: Another Repeater MIDI Controller >bof<

["Michael LaMeyer" <m.lameyer@verizon.net>]

The other drawback for me is that the pots are linear, and I've
found that relative pots are more intuitive for editing, but
that's just me.  Having both linear (faders) and relative pot
controls would suit me best.

Harrmph, ;-)

Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: "Claude Voit" <c.voit@vtx.ch>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: Another Repeater MIDI Controller >bof<


> Kevin Mulvihill wrote:
> >
> > Diligent readers of the list know that d/t is using a Peavey
PC1600x to
> > control his Repeater (and likely other nifty stuff as well).
I'm in the
> > market for something to control the Repeater as well as my
Kurzweil K2600RS
> > rack mount synth. Just today there was another post on the
Kurzweil list
> > about this controller: the Bitstream Pro from Wave Idea
> > (http://www.waveidea.com/english/index.htm). This actually
looks to be a
> > more fully featured controller than the Peavey - it is fully
programmable
> > and has 35 knobs, 8 sliders, 8 switches, 3 built-in user
setups, assignable
> > crossfaders, backlit LCD - heck, it's even got a built-in
programmable LFO!
> > Delivered with Windows 9x/2K configuration software, any
MIDI event or
> > message can be assigned to each potentiometer, switch, and
LFO. As soon as
> > the unit has been configured, the controller can be used in
standalone mode
> > without the PC.
> >
> > Looks great, but I'm wondering... has anyone ever heard of
this box? Anyone
> > used one or have any comments on it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kevin
>
> looks great untill you understand you only have 3 presets to
play with
> very short for the price
> the concept is brilliant though (lfo)
> pc1600x has 50 pages/presets (16 faders 16 buttons)
> 100 scenes (snapshoots)
> master fader groups ext CV ped to assign to any fader/group
> etc...
> pc editors
> and I think its cheaper
>
> Stop
>
> Back to work
>
> Claude
>