[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: no repeater wet/dry mix?

To: "'Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com'" <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
From: "Damon Langlois (Electrix)" <Damon@Electrixpro.com>
Subject: RE: no repeater wet/dry mix?
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:02:56 -0700

Yes, we did approach Repeater more like a recording device than an FX
processor. This is partly why the input mute is missing from this first
version. I say input mute because wet/dry mix isn't what is needed for the
broad use of this feature. I admit, it is an oversight and believe me we 
hit
ourselves in the head when we realized this. All I can say is we are 
looking
at it for the next OS release. 


Respect,

Damon Langlois
Creative Director
Electrix 
Tel (250) 544-4091 Fax (250) 544-4100
http://www.electrixpro.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: no repeater wet/dry mix?
  - From: Mark Sottilaro <sine@zerocrossing.net>
- Re: no repeater wet/dry mix?
  - From: jim palmer <jimp@pobox.com>
- RE: no repeater wet/dry mix?
  - From: "M. Steven Ginn" <sginn@airmail.net>

Prev by Date: RE: more RepeaTer 1st impressions
Next by Date: gig spam 31 august/1 sept 2001
Previous by Thread: Re: artifacts
Next by Thread: Re: no repeater wet/dry mix?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread
- Author