RE: no repeater wet/dry mix?

["Tom Ritchford" <tom@swirly.com>]

> Yes, we did approach Repeater more like a recording device than an FX
> processor. This is partly why the input mute is missing from this first
> version. I say input mute because wet/dry mix isn't what is needed for 
>the
> broad use of this feature. I admit, it is an oversight and believe me
we hit
> ourselves in the head when we realized this. All I can say is we are
looking
> at it for the next OS release. 

Input mute would be fine as far as I am concerned.

If you can fix it in software, then we are all
happy campers and all is golden!

Thanks for the fast and clear reply...

   /t


-- 

I am the wombat.