>alban berg might work for you as he wrote rows that had major chords
>in them, etc. somehow his stuff sounds more tonal than either
>schoenberg or webern (at least to my ears).
>
also to my ears, as if a good idea finally had evolved into something
beautifull
** the funny thing for me is that i actually think that webern was more consistent than berg. some of berg's music is just amazing (lyric suite coming to mind immediately), but some seems weak to me. i love the economy of means that webern had, the guy could say a lot in very, very little time.
stig