[on the NiN/Madonna "canned music" thing...]
> nevertheless,
> the audience doesn't *care* to know how the music is achieved --- however the
> quality of the music's effect might be judged, *that* seems to be the
> audience's primary concern.
** after having done two nights of playing behind an oldies act that basically did the same show (including patter and and "spontaneous" commentary) for three sets - - and knowing that this act does the same show year-in-year-out for something like 10-20 years . . . and seeing people sitting through two shows and loving them both (WHATEVER!!!), suffice it to say that i don't think that many audience members care much about how the music is manifested - - or often what it is. they are there for the show, the spectacle. now if you wanna talk about famous jazz artists who allegedly make "live albums" but cobbling together a "live tune" from 300 edits . . .
> >or Jaco's looping solo in the middle of Joni Mitchell gigs.
> jaco did that?
** while this shows how early people were doing this sort of thing with tape echoplexes, i want to reiterate that les mccann used to do this with a 4-channel tape echoplex (custom in think) on many sets in the early to mid-'70s. (his bass player jimmy rowser used to do his solo feature doing the same thing with a single-channel as well.) it wasn't just "cutting-edge" people like jaco who did this stuff . . .
stig
Confidentiality Warning: This e-mail contains information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, any dissemination, publication or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. The sender does not accept any responsibility for any loss, disruption or damage to your data or computer system that may occur while using data contained in, or transmitted with, this e-mail. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail. Thank you.