Re: Repeater vs EDP

["Clifford Novey" <om@Om-Studios.com>]

I hear the delay- I was bummed when I first plugged it in-

Couple of bugs in 1.1 - copy a loop onto itself on the CFC and it crashes,
the track meters stop responding sometimes for no apparent reason requiring
reboot too-

Other than that there are quite a few operational wishes I have for it- I
hope they are successful and can live long and prosper.

c

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Sottilaro" <sine@zerocrossing.net>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: Repeater vs EDP


> Stuart Wyatt wrote:
>
> >
> > I think my point earlier was just due to my frustration that I might be
> > stuck permanently with OS1.1 - Its buggy, could have so many options,
> > more midi implementation etc. etc.
>
> Buggy?  I was one of the 1.1 beta testers, and I can pretty much say that
> there are very few bugs in the current Repeater OS.  My Repeater is very,
> very stable.  I think I got it to crash once, but I was doing something
> odd... I forget what...
>
> More MIDI implementation?  Seems pretty robust to me.  Is there a 
>function
> you can't control via MIDI?
>
> I do agree that the Repeater would be a more useful box if it could end a
> loop in overdub.  I hope Electrix lives to make that a feature in a 
>future
> OS.  While they're at it, I'd love to be able to pre determine a loop
> length in measures.  Have it automatically drop out of record after 4 or 
>8
> measures.  I hate having to think about closing the loop at the right 
>time
> when synched to a MIDI clock.
>
> Also, I'm again hearing about the delay of the dry signal pass through 
>the
> Repeater.  If there is a latency, it must be very tiny.  I can not hear
> it.  I've hooked it up to an effects send, where it should have been
> apparent, and did not notice any delay.  Does anyone else here this 
>delay?
>
> Mark
>
>
>