[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: Delay Question
Thanks for the idea with the Repeater... I'll give that a go. Although
its not what I was originally looking for, it opens up other
possibilities :) Using feedback would reduce the strength of the loop
after each cycle... in fact thinking about it, I have just realised
that what I am asking for probably does not exist...
On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 11:50 PM, sine@zerocrossing.net wrote:
> Huh, I'm not sure what your rig is like, but why not use one stereo
> pair of
> the repeater for your "basic beat" then put the second stereo pair into
> record with a feedback of your choice. This can change all the time
> depending on how fast you want the second part to evolve.
>
> For bonus, I use a Lexicon MPX1's delay to grab a set chunk (anywhere
> from
> a 1/16 to an 1/8) of my loop and repeat it at will. This can be really
> cool. Kind of Andre LaFosse like, if I hit the sample (a/b) button at a
> kind of random point. I'm not sure how long it will stay synched, but
> it
> seems to go a long time. (btw, I'm not using clock from the Repeater to
> do
> this, as it doesn't work)
>
> If this doesn't work, I think the Echoplex in delay mode may be your
> only
> choice. I've had luck with synching an EDP to it. Be prepared to pay
> $1300 if you want it in stereo. Other delays seem to hate the
> Repeater's
> clock, including ones made by Electrix.
>
> Marklar
>