[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: Fw: Mixers For Guitar Signal - Opinions/Suggestions Please
Hi,
after a few hours of experimentation last night, and some new learnings!, I
have a bit a dilemma that I would like some input in solving.
I'm basically using 2 guitar amps. One outputs the guitar signal thru the
send into ch 1 of the mixer. The L/R outputs of the mixer are returned to
amp 1 (the original signal) and amp 2 (into the amp's return).
The effected sound thru amp 2 is great. Amp 1 is the problem. It is a
fender twin with a Mix control on the front - mixing amp signal with the
effects signal. The more i turn the Mix control, the more the effected
signal comes into the amp, but there goes my guitar tone which I want/must
preserve. As an experiment, I ran an insert from the guitar's mixer
channel into the amp's return and turned up the Mix knob. The guitar tone
maintained it's integrity even at a setting of 10 (max) on the Mix knob.
So, the mixer insert stays pretty true to the original guitar tone.
Now, I wonder how I can get the effected signal into amp 1's return without
sacrificing the guitar tone? That's the big problem. I want effects
coming thru both amp 1 and amp 2 And my true guitar signal.
I'll experiment more today/this evening. Any help is greatly appreciated!
Thanks!
Michael
At 10:34 AM 1/1/01 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi Michael,
>sorry, but I still can't post it directly to your address, so i make it
>public:
>
>this was the reply couldn't get through...
>
>
>Hi Michael,
>> > Hi Luca! Thanks for the great info. I have a question, though. I'm
>not
>> > sure how to use the inserts to get a signal w/o having a signal going
>into
>> > the channel of the insert, first. Something has to provide signal to
>the
>> > insert, yes/no?
>the inset you find in these mixers (i'm sure about the allen&heath, don't
>know about mackies, but it is a very common feature) is designed to put a
>stereo cable in it: the end of this stereo cable is divided into two mono
>jacks: one is a "send" and the other one a "return". This is done to allow
>you to put a dedicated compressor/eq into each single channel, after its
>preamp.
>BUT, if you put a mono jack with your signal coming from the preamp and
>you
>insert it NOT completely, you are using it just as return. In other words,
>you are going into that channel strip bypassing its preamp; this is
>exactly
>what i've been doing for a lot of time and should solve your tone
>preserving
>needs.
>
>> > What i want to do is use the guitar amp's pre amp (effects) send, and
>go
>> > into the mixer while bypassing the mixer preamps. Then, somehow send
>signal
>> > to various effects after/bypassing the mixer preamp stages.
>> >
>> > Then, return the mixer outputs into the effects loop returns of two
>amps,
>> > thus creating a stereo spread.
>A very important thing is: you have your "dry" mother signal on channel 1,
>then you have different auxes to work on (i choosed allen & heath because
>it
>is having 6 auxes that can be switched pre/post fader).
>Use each aux couple to feed each stereo processor inputs.
>BUT, don't put these effects' outputs into the aux returns: their outputs
>should go into different channels.
>Why ?
>Because in this way you can send effects outputs into other effects'
>inputs.
>This opens up a wide range of possibilities.... did you follow me ?
>I know it is sometimes difficult to explane this routings in words, tell
>me
>if i haven't been clear enough.
>Plus, if you run out of auxes,you can start using the groups' sends to act
>as semi-auxes.
>
>Let me know if it works,
>my best,
>luca
>
>>
>
>