[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: my first bad review
yes, some valid pts. it's funny all the things said in the (bad)
review are things that my brother has told me at one time or another.
i guess you take the good w/ the bad and it's the risk you take
when you put your stuff out.
to answer your question: at the present time i'm not charging for
my album, and certainly the reviewer got the copy for free. i had
read somewhere that major labels have to give out between 300-500
copies of all albums released, i'm nowhere near that (for me i've
sent out/given out between 80-90 copies). i guess it was an
experiment to see what would happen if i threw some of my "stuff"
out there. been a fun experiment. back in (art) grad school the
saying went: generally a bad review was better than a good review,
if someone has that strong of a reaction to your stuff, maybe it's
good in someway....oh well.....
thanks for the kind words of solice....s---
>It's like my mom used to say, "If you don't have anything nice to say
>about someone, wait until they leave the room."
>
>On the other hand, at least you have something to work with. What I
>find is worse is when you put some music out there and you get NO
>response. That always feels the worst to me. With good honest
>(although sometimes bad) critisism you can go back and look at what
>you've done and try to figure out how the reviewer came to that
>conclusion. My wife often will be critical of my music, then I hear her
>having the same opinions about a Boards of Canada track that I love and
>I think, "Oh, OK. She just doesn't dig *that* sort of thing." Other
>times she's got real nuts and bolts complaints that are SPOT ON. It's
>often hard to realize these imprefections when you're so close to the
>project. After I correct them I think, "How could I have missed that?"
>Sometimes it's annoying, when it's something I'm awear of and know I've
>got to fix during mixdown, or rerecord a track, but it's better to have
>it all the time than none of the time. My favorite crit from my wife
>is, "Isn't the guitar a bit loud in the mix?" HA! (it always is!)
>
>Here's my review policy: If it's free: it's GOOD. Anyone trying to do
>their thing is a *good* thing. Open mic nights are great examples of
>where anyone can go to hone their craft. I've heard that Beck can still
>be caught playing at an open mic night at a bowling alley somewhere
>every now and then.
>
>However if you're charging, it's open season. Were you charging for
>your CD? If so, I think the reviewer has a right and a duty to say what
>he feels. That's their job, no? A good reviewer will pass on a review
>if it's a genera that they don't like, but that's not the case here, so
>as bad as the review is, I'd take it as constructive and keep on going.
>
>Mark Sottilaro
>
>ArsOcarina@aol.com wrote:
>
>> Ouch!
>>
>> Speaking as one who has been on the receiving end of
>> similar reviews -- you have my sympathy. Don't take it
>> too hard. I am not familiar with your music. But it's
>> difficult to imagine that if the guy thought it was really
>> THAT bad why he'd waste the labor over words and
>> bandwidth? Seems kinda mean-spirited (IMOHO).
>>
>> tEd ® kiLLiAn
>>
>> http://www.mp3s.com/tedkillian
> > http://www.pfmentum.com/flux.htm
> > http://www.mp3.com/Ophelia_Pancake
--