Re: livelooping.com

[Geoff Smith <geoff.smith15@btopenworld.com>]

>> Well, the main thesis of Geoff's paper is that "Live Looping" is a 
>genre.
Originally it was just a history, remove chapters one and ten and you have
just that. That was the bulk of the research.
The genre idea came later.
I didn't realize it would create such arguments.
However I think it is something worth thinking and talking about.
I am refining my ideas about this all the time.
As like I said before when writing about something it is usual to reference
your work to others, however there is currently a drought of written
material about Live-Looping.
 
Geoff

>>>> Geoff Smith's LiveLooping Research Paper
>>> 
>>> I really cannot see what is wrong with this? Maybe someone can 
>enlighten me.
>> 
>> Well, the main thesis of Geoff's paper is that "Live Looping" is a 
>genre.
>> 
>> It is a genre, it isn't a genre, more confusion....
>> 
>> Part of the point here is to get you guys to think about what you
>> are doing and get a clear foundation under it. It seems really fuzzy
>> right now.
>> 
> 
> Thats because its not done.
> You say you dont mind, but anyone can feel that you are not
> supporting but holding back the idea. Sometimes you say that you say
> all that just to alert us to do it better, but... I dont feel that...
> 
> I just can repeat what Stuart mentioned: if you are going to pick on
> every word we are going to put on that site, we either cannot do it
> or will have to stop comunicating about it on LD. Both solutions dont
> seem to be in the interest of anyone.