[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: Availability of Echoplex, will it ever come?
hi:
i'm new to the list. i ended up selling my repeater..now i want it
back! i use ableton live 3.o and NI reaktor, but i am unable to find
software that enable sound-on-sound overdubbing/looping.
i know that alto sound in middletown NY USA has echoplex in stock
(well, a while ago) but it's worth a shot. sorry, i dont have their
telephone number.
per, i have seen your posts on various lists and boards and have
visited your website. some day i hope to jam with you. =) i do
abstract electronic music. www.astromass.com
thanks all,
+()Dd\
(instruction shuttle)
www.astromass.com
On Feb 26, 2004, at 1:14 PM, David J. Grossman wrote:
>> I have had an Echoplex on order since December 18 of 2003 at Musicians
>> Friend. The availability date keeps getting pushed back, and now
>> Musicians Friend has the avilability date as May 5. Has anyone had
>> any
>> luck buying an Echoplex in the past month or so?
>
> I bought that "scratch and dent" one they had on sale a couple of
> weeks ago
> but it was way more screwed up than what they defined as a "scratch and
> dent" item. The whole faceplate was bent outwards on the right, a knob
> was
> missing and two of the other knobs were floating around the box. One of
> those knobs was actually cracked too. In any event, it wasn't worth the
> savings of only $120 out of $799 for something that was that tweaked
> so I
> returned it to exchange for a new one. I'm still waiting on my new one
> with
> the rest of you.
>
> Here's a warning though, if you see a scratch and dent Echoplex show
> up at
> Musician's Friend in the next week or so, don't buy it unless you're
> willing
> to live with something that may have been dropped or taken apart and
> poorly
> reassembled. They probably had the thing ( serial # 79 or something
> like
> that ) sitting around for a year and figured they could get rid of it
> since
> the other units were so hard to get. It's not worth $679 though. Not
> in that
> condition.
>
> - Dave
>
>