[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

kim's post, athlon processors, et. al.



Kim,

Thanks for that post (reprinted below)................you are so correct.

I laughed out loud when I read
"If you are building a performance PC and you don't understand these 
things,
you might as well turn the lights out and throw darts at the dell catalog."

I have a dell that I love to throw darts at.

Of course, as Kim so accurately points out, everything in your system
(motherboard,chipset, cpu, ram, peripherals, sound card, etc., etc.) has to
work together so it's not a simple answer.
I tore my hair out the first year that I was trying to compose on a 
computer
with cheapo parts that didn't want to talk with each
other..............enough so that my wife asked,  "why don't we just give 
up
and get a Mac............lol".

I then invested in a more powerful Dell and struck out a second time.

 The third time I struck gold and  had a good friend of mine , Daniel 
Thomas
who is very sophisticated with PC recording studio setups (and has about
four CDs that he's produced make it onto the world music charts in the past
three years) custom build me my last computer (which is really amazing and
trouble free so far).
He did it relatively inexpensively (about $700) but I already had
monitors,keyboards, CD players and a few other things that he cannibalized
from my old system.   I know that he took great care, specifically , in
picking out
an appropriate chipset and motherboard that use the new hyperthreading
technology.

I'll see if I can get his recommendations for what to buy if he were to
build something right now and post them for anyone who is interested.  This
is on the PC side.

 I imagine that if you bought a dual processor G5 with maximum CPU speed 
and
a good
MOTU audio interface that you could probaby be humming in the first week of
owning the system.   Just be prepared to lay out $3,000-$4,500 for such a
system.

Also, regarding Athlon processors,   the latest issue of Future Music 
(which
is a UK magazine that seems pretty spot on regarding computer  music
recommendations) says that the Athlons have come a long way since
the days when the conventional wisdom was that you should eschew one for a
Pentium.

I honestly wish that the hardware looping world would continue to progress
with the times.  As Kim has pointed out in the past,  it is so much more
efficient to have a closed architecture system that is designed 
specifically
for the task and works straight out of the box.

Unfortunately,  this just doesn't seem to be happening and, unless Gibson,
announces that they will keep manufacturing the EDP, we will soon get to 
the
point where there will no longer be a midi syncable live looping hardware
box that will be available brand new----with used ones topping the $1,000
range quickly, the way the Repeater has.

It's concievable that we just don't have the numbers to make a live looping
box viable economically so I imagine that, imperfect as it is,  the future
of this movement technologically will be in software developement which is
cheaper to develop (sans the hardware manufacturing costs).

Of course, the future of the musical incarnation of live looping techniques
will be a mixture of the artists using the new software apps and the
artists who own the cool 'retro' gear, like most of us.   Witness what Max
Valentino is doing with a couple of suped up Lexicon Jammans.


yours, rick





kim wrote:
it is far more complicated than that....

Which Athlon? (or which Pentium?)
Which chipset? (this probably matters even more than the cpu.)
which motherboard?
what memory is installed?
what is the FSB speed?
what is the memory speed?
cas latency?
which hard disk?  which ATA interface? ATA100? ATA133? SATA?
which graphics chip? standalone? integrated?
AGP 1x? 4x? 8x? PCI express?
what peripherals are installed?
how do the all various peripherals load the busses?
do the peripherals add to cpu load or offload it?
which bios?
which drivers? versions?

etc, etc, etc.

If you are building a performance PC and you don't understand these things,
you might as well turn the lights out and throw darts at the dell catalog.

If you are interested in performance, there are a lot more variables than
the cpu. And there is far more below the hood that affects you than what
you see looking at the windows desktop. Going for the cheapest hardware can
mean a huge compromise if you don't know what you really need. No version
of windows can save you if the hardware isn't up to it. (Be prepared to
spend a whole bunch of time at anandtech, tomshardware, etc to figure it
out....)


>good thing about the mac is that you quickly find out which one you need
:-)

even there, do you understand the difference between G4 and G5? DDR memory
versus SDR? DDR FSB? Dual CPU? single? etc? There are many less choices,
but still plenty of ways to go wrong.

>>Next desktop for me will be G5 whenever I get around to it (not soon).
Next
>>notebook is either TabletPC or a G4, prolly G4.
>
>yeah, a tabletPC would be perfect for stage! but do they have the
>necessary features and price?