[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: photos of Electrix MkII units.



Where these pictures taken at the NAMM show?

Were where they?

I was at the show and I could not find Electrix. They are not listed in 
the show directory under Electrix or IVL.

I'll be disappointed if I missed them.

Henry


the toy room wrote:

> Still looks like an Instrument input on the front panel, though.
> 
> There have been rumours of the front panel input being removed from the
> MKII, as one of the current modifications being done on MKI Repeaters is
> improved grounding and shielding to lower the noise floor (and this
> necessitates removing the front panel input).
> 
> Best,
> Rich
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: L. Angulo [mailto:labalou2000@yahoo.com] 
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 5:40 AM
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Subject: Re: photos of Electrix MkII units.
> 
> very nice looking repeater! i wonder if the will sell
> the faceplates...
> Luis
> 
> 
> --- Suit & Tie Guy <erwill@suitandtieguy.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>very pretty:
>>
> 
> http://www.fdiskc.com/usrsyn/namm/2005/electrixmkII-tb.html
> 
>>i think maybe it's time to sell my WarpFactory.
>>
>>i'm going to replace it with a Micron and a
>>rackmount mic pre or blank 
>>faceplate with an XLR input. i never use anything
>>but one very plain 
>>setting on my WarpFactory, and i have to key it from
>>an Alpha Juno 1. i 
>>think the Micron would be more efficient, and create
>>room for my 
>>PC1600x and better fit next to the 909 on the
>>sliding shelf i plan on 
>>moving to underneath the rack.
>>
>>does anyone want to talk me out of selling my
>>Warpfactory?
>>---
>>Eric Williamson
>>www.suitandtieguy.com
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> =====
> www.luis-angulo.com
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> __________ NOD32 1.980 (20050123) Information __________
> 
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.nod32.com
>