[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: flexible looper in small packag
Well, I use a 'low-end' looper and am not someone who wishes to pre-
record backing tracks. The likes of an RC-20, DL-4 and Headrush are
expensive enough without having to worry that I can't afford
something that doesn't constitue a 'low-end' looper.
These aforementioned items may not have all the functions of a more
expensive looper, but loopers they still are. I may be missing out,
but i'm still finding out many amazing things through the use of
these loopers. i don't consider a moment using these as wasting time.
-david
> From: Jesse Kates <jesse@lunarium.com>
> Date: 28 August 2005 18:19:17 BDT
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Subject: Re: flexible looper in small package
>
>>>
>>
>> This seems to be true, unfortunately. Or at least it is true among
>> the big name brands trying to make low-end loopers. I'm astonished
>> at how clueless the designers of some of these recent devices are.
>> They could come here and spend 10 minutes asking people what they
>> really want in a looper and create a killer product, but they don't.
>>
>> The sad thing is, many musicians get their introduction to looping
>> by way of one of these crappy devices. They miss out on important
>> fundamentals of looping as a result. It must be frustrating to
>> waste time learning on one of these things. Like learning to play
>> guitar on an instrument with one string.
>>
>
> I think the market for these low-end loopers (like the RC-20) may
> not be the constituency of this list. I imagine they sell most of
> their units to musicians who want to pre-record backing tracks.
> How many people are on this list, anyway?
>
> Jesse