[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
RE : Naming a software looper
Hi Warren, maybe you could also try using anagrams
to find something different for a name;
I just tried a few things here :
http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/index.html
"looper" returns "leo pro" which does not say a lot
about loops but does not sound bad to me (leo = lion);
"soft looper" returns "fortes loop" or "eros of plot",
"multiloop" returned ... "opium toll" !!!
etc etc ...
Francois
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Warren Sirota [mailto:wsirota@wsdesigns.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 18 novembre 2005 22:56
À : Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Objet : Naming a software looper
Thanks, Stephen. I agree with you that names are important. That's why
I'm struggling with it.
I had a dream right before I woke up this morning - I don't remember
what the dream was about, but one word was prominent in it: Helio. It
doesn't have anything to do with looping, but then neither does Ableton
(many other products are not named to reflect their capabilities). A
dictionary search reveals that "Helios" was the god of the sun or
something like that.
So there's one name. Another that I thought of was MultiLoop, but I'm
not sure how well that really reflects anything. I also thought of "FNEZ
Looper" (read it out loud), but that's a bit on the crude side, I guess.
One person I talked to liked it, someone else cringed. Cringing is not
good.
The things that are most unique about this looper (I think, I hope) are:
- instant gratification, easy learning curve
- Can be operated in hands-free mode; works with most footcontrollers
(but a multi-bank footcontroller is best; basic functions can be in the
first bank, advanced functions in others)
- CD-quality, stereo looping
- loop layers are independently mutable and re-mixable
- built in digital multitrack recorder makes pristine recordings of your
live playing, your loops and aux inputs (like the people you're playing
with)
- peak limiting on the output. In later versions, different forms of
multiband compression will be supported
- with a touch of your toe (here I go into marketing-speak), you can
save all the loops into individual files for later processing with Acid
or the DAW of your choice.
- PC (XP) and MAC (OS/X)
- affordability - I anticipate 3 versions, one at $89 or so, one at $199
and one at $299.
- support for VST plugins to modify the input to the looper and the
total mix output
At present, it's a fairly basic looper/recorder. In addition to the
basic looper, reverse is there, as well as continuously-varying playback
speed, controlled by footpedal or mouse (the pitch changes, but it's a
pretty good effect). But the architecture is very solid, and I expect to
be adding fancy effects rapidly once I get past the initial hurdles of
documentation, installers, security (I hate dealing with sw security,
but you gotta do it), press releases and all that stuff.
I put a couple of screenshots up at www.warrensirota.com/looper so you
can get a better idea.
I'd love naming suggestions suggestions and votes on the ones I've got:
Helio (or Helios) and MultiLoop.
Thanks,
Warren Sirota
www.warrensirota.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: S V G [mailto:vsyevolod@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 2:22 PM
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Subject: Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V05 #746
>
>
>
> Warren,
>
> Naming can be a very powerful thing. Especially if you
> are able to describe within the name what is unique about the
> object to be named. Secondarily, the name can be pleasant to
> the ear, or at least memorable. Associations with other
> products is usually not desireable.
>
> When I hear the name AccuLoop, my mind immediately goes
> to all the cheaply designed and built woodworking tools from
> overseas. "Accu" as a prefix, just doesn't instill
> confidence in a product, at least to this boy.
>
> Naming your looper has the potential to make it or break
> it. A good example is the software called Chopitch. Does it
> mean that your chops will start itching?
>
> Good luck finding an appropriate name for it.
> Currently, AccuLoop doesn't do much for me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Stephen
>
>
>
>
> Warren wrote:
> It's a little hard for me to complete the docs, though,
> because I'm at sea for a name. I'm thinking maybe AccuLoop.
> Whaddya think? (that, totally without an explanation of what
> makes it special, is not exactly an easy question - but
> whether the name should be related to the specific features
> or not is also not an easy one).
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>