[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Looperlative LP1 - sample rate



Well, I'd definitely be interested in less sample/loop time to secure 
higher
sampling rates up to 192kbps!  From what I read, the Looperlative has lots
of memory. I imagine heat and power consumption may become issues...

Good luck with the design and coding.

David

P.S.  As mentioned by someone else, USB 2 would be a great feature!


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Amstadt" <bob@amstadt.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: Looperlative LP1 - sample rate


> The electronics in the LP1 are capable of sampling rates up to 192kbps.  
>I
> have not actually run the unit at that speed, but I may experiment with 
>it
> at a later date.  The big reason that I didn't run it at that speed is
that
> as you increase sampling rate you also increase the amount memory 
>required
> to store the audio.  So, the LP1 will be hitting the streets with a 
>48kbps
> sampling rate.
>
> --On Tuesday, December 13, 2005 7:34 PM -0500 David Kirkdorffer
> <vze2ncsr@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > Ronan has a point - of course, my wish would be for a higher sample
rates
> > in the 196K range.  But at this point, I can tell that would not be a
> > possibility.  Hey, that can wait for the Looperlative-Killer!  :-)
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ronan Chris Murphy" <looper@venetowest.com>
> > To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 5:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: Looperlative LP1 - sample rate
> >
> >
> >> I checked out the web site and this box looks really cool! I saw that
> >> the current sample rate is 48k, while sonically that is OK, if I was
> >> building this box I would think seriously about 44.1. This could open
> >> up more possibilities down the road for seamless compatibility via the
> >> ethernet connection. It seems at some point you would be able to take
> >> things off of CD and import them into Looperlative as loops, but more
> >> importantly if you performed a really beautiful loop(s) on
> >> Looperlative, it seems that you could at some point transfer that to
> >> your computer and mix and or master from those files with out going
> >> through a quality degrading re-sample to make it commercial CD
> >> compatible.
> >>
> >> Ronan Chris Murphy
> >> www.venetowest.com (Production & mixing: King Crimson, Chucho Valdes,
> >> Steve Morse, Terry Bozzio, CGT...)
> >> www.homerecordingbootcamp.com (Workshops around the world teaching the
> >> art and craft of recording )
> >> www.livesofthesaints.net (The hottest ambient noise duo since Sonny &
> >> Cher)
> >>
> >>
> >> On Dec 13, 2005, at 12:28 PM, Bob Amstadt wrote:
> >>
> >> > MIDI sync is not in yet, but it is currently on the top of the list
of
> >> > software features to be added.
> >> >
> >> > Feedback control is in the current software and can be controlled
from
> >> > the front panel or via a foot pedal.  MIDI button control of 
>feedback
> >> > is on the list of features to be added.
> >> >
> >> > Manual faders exist for each track and can be controlled via the
front
> >> > panel or a foot pedal.  Automatic fading is a feature on the 
>software
> >> > to do list.
> >> >
> >> > --On Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:46 AM -0800 mark sottilaro
> >> > <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> That does indeed sound like a Repeater/EDP killer!  I
> >> >> didn't see anything about it's ability to sync to a
> >> >> MIDI clock or have variable feedback.  Two "must have"
> >> >> feature of a looper in my world.  Man, if it did
> >> >> direct to overdub... feedback control AND fade control
> >> >> on each channel (have a loop fade while you start to
> >> >> build another on another track)  That would be sweet.
> >> >>
> >> >> Mark
> >> >>
> >> >> --- Doug Cox <dougcox@pdq.net> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Heya gang,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Not that you couldn't go get this info with a bit of
> >> >>> browsing, but I've
> >> >>> compiled all of the things I could find here and at
> >> >>> Bob's site into a
> >> >>> blog post at my blog site.  You're invited to come
> >> >>> by and take a look if
> >> >>> you want a condensed version of what we know so far.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> http://www.uncledig.com/blog/archives/44
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I have Bob's blessing on this (thanks Bob!).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> There's also a chance that I'll be doing a phone
> >> >>> interview with Bob
> >> >>> sometime in the near future, and presenting that as
> >> >>> an audioblog
> >> >>> entry/podcast.  Maybe even a series of interviews as
> >> >>> the LP1 develops.
> >> >>> No promises on that just yet - but I think we can
> >> >>> figure something out.
> >> >>> You're welcome to email me offlist if there are
> >> >>> things you'd like to see
> >> >>> addressed in an interview like that.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Definitely planning some phone interviews with other
> >> >>> loopstars from the
> >> >>> list.  I'll leave you in suspense on that one :)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Also, if you snoop around, you'll see that I'm in
> >> >>> the beta testing
> >> >>> stages of an interesting musician's online community
> >> >>> at the root of my
> >> >>> domain (http://www.uncledig.com).  It's just getting
> >> >>> started, but if you
> >> >>> read through it and like what you see, feel free to
> >> >>> sign up and even
> >> >>> post some of your music in the appropriate category.
> >> >>>  I'll post about
> >> >>> this to the list again very soon, once I get all of
> >> >>> the features fully
> >> >>> tested and online.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Loop on, loopsters.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Doug
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> __________________________________________________
> >> >> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> >> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>
>
>