Re: comparison chart of the different loopers (was: Refining the first of possibly many stupid questions)

[Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>]

Hi David,

Good idea, but I'm afraid that wouldn't work since the magazine is  
only publishing on paper. But I, as the writer, can publish a "pirate  
copy" of the chart without harming any paper issue mag sales. It's on  
my list.

per

On 29 mar 2006, at 02.19, David Kirkdorffer wrote:

> Perhaps the magazine can reproduce part of the chart and then drive  
> readers
> to its website for the all-inclusive in-depth everything-you-want- 
> to-know
> version?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Per Boysen" <perboysen@gmail.com>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 5:54 PM
> Subject: comparison chart of the different loopers (was: Refining  
> the first
> of possibly many stupid questions)
>
>
>> On 29 mar 2006, at 00.28, Richard Sales wrote:
>>
>>> I'd love to see a comparison chart of the different loopers and
>>> what they can and can't do.  Does that exist?
>>
>> I recently did one, but unfortunately in Swedish because it was
>> ordered by a Swedish guitar magazine. However, we're not publishing
>> until I can get the RC-50 as well into the chart and article, and
>> then we're talking late may. If I can find the time I would like to
>> translate at least the chart into English and put it online asap. If
>> that happens I will notify the list, of course. Fact is I wouldn't
>> mind some helpful feedback as well ;-)  It's too easy to miss out on
>> details that might be more important for other users. And since there
>> is not enough room in one chart to list every feature of every
>> looper, the real challenge is to decide what to leave out.
>>
>> Greetings from Sweden
>>
>> Per Boysen
>> www.boysen.se (Swedish)
>> www.looproom.com (international)
>> http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?
>> id=128679560&s=143456