[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re:Re: FlyLooper & market potential
>Aaron is writing a software looper, and presumably wants to make
>money selling it. Instead of supporting MIDI like practically every
>other piece of music software in the world, he was going to build his
>own custom footswitch that would only work with his software.
>
>Many, if not most, of the people that are going to be interested in
>this looper don't want another friggin' footswitch. Not supporting
>MIDI, at least as an option, is insane.
with the standard "my2cents" disclaimer, and respect to Jeff:-
The advantage is presumably that the footswitch works as a dongle,
which is a useful consideration in profit terms.
Doesn't that Korg Legacy thing rely on a similar principle?
I could imagine that having a nice light small footswitch to work
the looper, while using the laptop to set up FX & sounds
would be most acceptable for a portable rig.
andy butler