[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: Sheer Volume on this List
Clint you hit the ball ive learned quite a lot from
some threads in this list which sometimes have an
uninteresting header for me and was about to delete!
and this is precisely what makes me coming
back,weather is a link to a great non looping
inspiring musician,equiment,effects,ways of routing
things,or taking a break and having a philosophy
discussion,sometimes somewhere on a line i find what i
was looking for.Compared to other forums this is still
the best and more focused,but yes we do sometimes
forget to change the subject.
Luis
--- Krispen Hartung <khartung@cableone.net> wrote:
> That's a great recommendation, Clint. I am guilty of
> changing subjects and not reflecting it in the
> subject heading. I'll make a point to do that more
> now.
>
> K-
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Clint Allen
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 9:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Sheer Volume on this List
>
>
> Speaking for myself, I often find it hard to gauge
> what might be interesting,
> based off of the subject lines. Many times I have
> deleted emails in this forum
> only to find out later that there was some very
> interesting discussion going on.
> Other times, exactly the opposite or I have read
> through volumes to find nothing.
>
> I think there needs to be a more of an effort to
> change subject lines when the
> thread starts to change, which it so often does.
>
> I've nothing really to offer on this subject other
> than to say I'd rather recieve as much info
> as possible and have the option to delete, than
> vice-versa.
>
> Clint Allen
>
>
>
> On 7/26/06, Krispen Hartung
> <khartung@cableone.net> wrote:
> Hmmm...the number of emails on this list has
> never been a problem to
> me...it's all about being able to prioritize on
> the fly and not feel the
> need to read everything I see. I get hundreds of
> emails a day from work, sit
> on conference calls, lead meetings, someetimes
> from 6am to 6pm, plus
> exchange instant messages with my peers while on
> conference calls...plus
> keep up with LD emails and other list emails.
>
> It takes a fraction of a second to read the
> subject heading of an email and
> delete it. For me quantity has notning to do
> with it. The more time I
> have, the less emails I delete or leave un-read.
> Go to digest mode, or just
> start sorting by subject heading and deleting
> multiple emails at the same
> time....all this takes mere seconds.
>
> Or am I not getting something here? What is
> taking most of folks time? Are
> you tryin to read everything? Seriously, how
> long does it take to delete
> your inbox.
>
> Kris
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Buzap Buzap" <buzap@gmx.net>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 8:45 AM
> Subject: Sheer Volume on this List
>
>
> > Hi Richard
> >
> >> I think some folks ..are overwhelmed by the
> >> sheer volume of communication that happens on
> this list.
> >
> > I actually the same. I know I'm currently
> active but I know I'll probably
> > drop-off once other subjects will have a
> higher priority.
> >
> > What do you guys think of having a FORUM
> instead of a mailling list?
> > The good thing about forums is that you can
> browse in a structured way and
> > don't have to scroll through millions of
> mails..
> >
> > Best regards
> > Buzap
> > --
> >
> >
> > Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*.
> Nur noch kurze Zeit!
> > "Feel free" mit GMX DSL:
> http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
www.myspace.com/luisangulocom
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com