[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: process Vs product
That's exactly what I like to do. I like to have my recording environment
ready to go and whenever I start playing following a warmup, I record.
The amazing thing is going back and listening to stuff that was recorded
in the past. I pulled out a box of zip disks no less that I recorded
using a Roland VS-840 rig and have been previewing them. Many songs I
never committed to CD because there might have been a sour note or perhaps
portions of the song were not terrifically inspiring, hence they haven't
seen the light of day for 5 years or more. BUT, I've noticed a lot of the
old stuff sounded pretty darn good and even the lower eschelon ones had
some sections that warranted cutting out and using as separate pieces.
--
Paul Richards
---- David Kirkdorffer <vze2ncsr@verizon.net> wrote:
> I used to record my jams to a cassette deck even. I'd just record things
> for a few weeks. Then I'd go back and listen to them. Very often I was
> surprized by what I discovered. The distance would help divorce me from
>the
> emotions I had as I played them. Mostly things seemed to get better.
>
> I totally agree that while the process can be interesting ultimately it
>is
> irrelevant to the end result, which needs to be "good music" in and of
>it's
> own right.
>
> David
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "gareth whittock" <gareth@whiteoakstudios.freeserve.co.uk>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 4:24 AM
> Subject: Re: process Vs product
>
>
> > I think Tangerine Dream worked like this. They'd record hours of
>jamming
> and
> > cut it into shape for an album.
> > Anyone here doing this?
> >
> > Gareth
> >
>