[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: "Instrument" vs "Effect"
It's logical that Charles can't accept the effect to be an extension of
"the
instrument" since he is one of the first guys alert on OT mails ;-) ...
All
in one pack!
The Playing Orchestra: http://www.telefonica.net/web2/tpo
Chain Tape Collective: http://www.ct-collective.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Zwicky" <cazwicky@earthlink.net>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: "Instrument" vs "Effect"
> These systems in their entirety are often referred to as an instrument,
> for instance Jimi Hendrix and his Marshalls, Jon Hassel and his
> harmonizer... I think this discussion got of on the wrong foot by
>claiming
> that an effect was an instrument. This may be correct, Electro Harmonix
>is
> of the philosophy that their 16 second delay and 2880 are 'looping
> instruments'.
> --
> ...
> http://www.zmix.net
>