[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: AW: fractal loops (was: keeping loops interesting)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Good" <bsgood@adelphia.net>
> You could make things even "fractaler" by applying the same method to
> pitch, if you don't mind jettisoning the twelve-note-per-octave
>chromatic
> scale. Play a chord. Pick one note as the root. Note the ratios of the
> frequencies of all the other notes to that of the root. Scale the ratios
> by a number much less than one, generating a new "chord" whose pitches
>are
> likely much closer together than a half step. Replace each note in the
> original chord with a copy of the "chord," pitch-shifted to the original
> root. Repeat until traumatized.
I like this. Now this is starting to seem like the fractal examples I am
accustomed to reading about or seeing.
By the way, having a background in philosophy, I discovered that some of
Leibniz' thoughts influenced fractal theory, which makes a lot of sense to
me in the above example. He built a metaphysical system of thought, his
depiction of the universe, which consisted of an infinite number of
"monads"...sort of like self-contained "windowless" metaphysical atoms.
According to his system each monad is a world unto itself, in that it
reflects the whole like a mirror. It's a bizarre theory, very spooky. In
short, each part reflects some nature of the whole, as in the example
above
with those chords, as in the phenomenon of holographic images (though only
in similarity, not exactness, to appease Rainer and Andy)....the whole is
the big monad, or "Modad" as I like to call it. :)
By the way, Leibniz looked like a modern rock star:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibniz
"Mandelbrot's well-known fractal geometry drew on Leibniz's notions of
self-similarity and the principle of continuity: natura non facit saltus.
We
also see that when Leibniz wrote, in a metaphysical vein, that "the
straight
line is a curve, any part of which is similar to the whole..." he was
anticipating topology by more than two centuries."
Here is another really interesting article on Leibniz' monads and their
fractal properties...fascinating. Now I want to go back and read his
Monadology again.
Another analogy to fractal theory, which actuallyl came before fractal
theory is the Rationalist theory of knowledge (Leibniz was a Rationalist
by
the way, so this makes sense), such as from Decartes and Spinoza. One
might
describe Descartes system of knowledge by the "pocket paradox" analogy,
wherebye putting my hand in my own pocket, I can tell what is in the
contents of someone else's pocket, direct knowledge with no empirical
data.
Likewise, according to Rationalists, you can actually reveal the secrets
of
the universe (truths) via the mind alone...again, that concept of the
whole
being contained in each part in some fashion. The cosmos inside the mind,
such that we can metaphorically "view" its structure and deduce truths.
Kris