[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: Musolomo to go Open Source...
Very cool! I hope they do the same with Rax and Wormhole.
--Josh
On Apr 28, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Mech wrote:
> Since there are a few devs on the list here, I figured this might
> be of some general interest.
>
> In the wake of Comic Life's success of on the Mac, Plasq seems to
> have made a decision to divest itself of its audio software (which
> currently leaves both Rax and Wormhole in a somewhat precarious
> position). As to the fate of their freeware Looping program --
> Musolomo -- one of the Plasq admins (atariboy) has unofficially
> announced that it will be going Open Source in a forum thread here:
> http://preview.tinyurl.com/2dsguj
>
> For those of you who've never used it before, Musolomo is a quirky
> little Looping plug that features a variety of interesting
> functions -- instant sample mapping and transposition, forward/
> reverse, DJ-style scratching, and an X-Y pad, just to name a few.
> The transposition in particular is actually pretty good/
> interesting, as it was partially coded by Airy Andre (who also did
> the Speedster plug). The package is still up for download on the
> Plasq site, and there's even a Universal Binary version that's been
> made available through the forums.
>
> Personally, the main gripes I've had with Musolomo are that there's
> no real Feedback mechanism (so I really think of it more as a
> Phrase Sampler than a Looper), and that the allocated memory fills
> up fairly quickly. It seems I always have to open multiple
> instances and use them simultaneously to get around the memory
> issue. Otherwise, it's an interesting little Looping tool.
>
> Perhaps in the future somebody might try developing it a bit
> further, or porting it to a different platform (or at the very
> least just add a frickin' Feedback function to the darn thing --
> please!). If nothing else, having a look at the source code might
> give some of the other developers here ideas for implementation of
> feature sets on their own products.
>
> --m.
>
>
>