[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: LooperWiki needed.



Thanks, Warren.

It actually wasn't fast, but had been sitting there for a long time  
(as Doug just pointed out).

I only wanted to show that the idea to offer a lot of valuable  
information on LD in a more structured way has been thought about  
before.
The advantage of a Wiki would be that the content would not need to  
wait for anyone to upload it to LD but instead could be contributed  
by anyone who has the time and the interest. See wikipedia.

Interesting that Web 2.0 hasn't been mentioned on this list yet. The  
cycle where someone proposes to turn LD into a forum has just passed  
again a few weeks ago. But there are so many concepts that have been  
invented since mailing lists (like blogs, tags, wikis, social  
networks, etc.), that LD in particular would profit from.

Bernhard

On 25.08.2007, at 02:55, Warren Sirota wrote:

> Far out, Bernhard. Fast work.
>
> Warren
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bernhard Wagner LD [mailto:loopdelightml-NDI3MDE=-
>> @bernhardwagner.net]
>> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 4:40 AM
>> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>> Subject: Re: LooperWiki needed.
>>
>> http://www.xmlizer.biz/cgi-bin/LoopersDelightReviews/kwiki.cgi
>>
>> On 24.08.2007, at 10:32, Buzap Buzap wrote:
>>
>>> yeah, would be great.
>>> We could put all the technical hints for our gear in there and just
>>> link-reference in the mail postings...
>>> Buzap
>
>