[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: Canford Headphone Limiter (In Ear Monitoring revisited)
I'm another skeptic of in-ear monitors - so I don't speak from
experience here... I would point out that compressors in general, if
improperly used, are prime feedback offenders.
I don't care for headphones much either, but they've got to be much more
easily removed in the event of feedback.
Maybe a 2-stage expander->limiter would provide a predictable level in
an in-ear system.
Dan Ash
White Plains, NY
Subject:
Re: Canford Headphone Limiter (In Ear Monitoring revisited)
From:
Sam Nilsson <sam@servingpeace.com>
Date:
Sun, 04 May 2008 12:43:54 -0700
To:
Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Buzap Buzap wrote:
> I was taking a look at in ear monitoring systems.
> One thing that disturbed me:
> Even though most wireless IEM systems have a limiter, most only have
> limiter on the _sender_ but not on the receiver.
Hi Buzap,
I think that the most sensible solution is to have a built-in limiter on
the bodypack. I think that a lot of them actually do have that feature.
For instance even the most basic Shure wireless bodypack model has a
limiter:
http://www.shure.com/ProAudio/Products/PersonalMonitorSystems/us_pro_P2R_content
- Sam