Re: OT: adrenalinn users help?

["L.Angulo" <labaloops@yahoo.com>]

Hi Scott,
i ve been using the adrenalinn in my rig recently in fact i used it in my 
last looping gig.
I find it a very nice box actually i have the Adrenalinn III and the amp 
simlutations are really good,(i think you do have to upgrade)but i am most 
impressed by the quality of the time sync filters i have not found 
anything like it in any other EFX proccessor!
also the drum sounds and grooves are really nice for doing groovy stuff 
every once in a while,using it it to test midi sync stuff,as a simple drum 
machine or to even teach;-)
so i think for the money is a good box,plus Roger keeps updating it.
Ive been testing it with the Eventide timefator trying to midi sync 
both,at first i jumped for joy when i synced the TF loop to the adrenalinn 
drum groove but after letting it run for a while they became unsynced;-((( 
however,the dealys do sync to the Adrenalinn nicely.
If the looper on the TF would sync to the adrenalinn it would be an 
awesome combination!!! you could just take this two boxes which are about 
the same size and do amazing stuff with it!

www.myspace.com/luisangulocom


--- On Sun, 3/22/09, Todd Howell <ransacker@earthlink.net> wrote:

> From: Todd Howell <ransacker@earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: OT: adrenalinn users help?
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 5:33 PM
> 
> #yiv1989593617 {font-family:Geneva, Arial,
> Helvetica,
> sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color:#ffffff;color:black;}
> 
>  
>  
> Scott,
> Using Adrenalinn II in my current principal rig. I use
> it just before my amp (Vox AC 30 CC1). I don't tend to
> use the amp models that much, being that I am rather fond of
> my current amp. When I do, it is usually an over driven AC
> 30 or a Marshall Plexi. I find that making sure to engage
> the complete bypass and care fully tweaking the volume and
> effect levels, you can remove the vast majority of the (for
> lack of a better term) digital-ness. There tends to be this
> weird artifact when I don't really pay attention the the
> previous and play at any volume. I am not a super
> programming cat. Hence, I am sure there are packet of
> more experienced types who will probably have more in-depth
> answers for you. I find as long as my power is relatively
> clean (remarkably everything in front of it is run with a
> Visual sound OneSpot). 
> As far as filtering options, you might want to look at
> the Adrenalinn III up-grade ($99.00 on Roger Linn Site).
> Supposedly more filtering options, the amp models sound good
> on the clips and there are more of them. I am not familiar
> with the Behringer bit if kit to which you refer. I have no
> real way to compare.  
> Tell me if this is at all helpful. I may not get back to
> with blinding haste as I am neck deep in dolls and dirty
> nappies.
> Take Care,
> Todd Howell
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: scott hansen 
> Sent: Mar 22, 2009 5:47 PM 
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com 
> Subject: OT: adrenalinn users help? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> just curious if anyone uses an adrenalinn in their
> setup?
> i just got an adrenalinn II, and have tried it in my
> setup, and i've not been very happy w/ the sound.
> i don't know, maybe i have too high expectations
> for it.
> over all i have been unimpressed w/ the amp models
> compared to my digitech rp150 and zoom g2 setup.
> and the effects i also think aren't that great-my
> filters on my behringer tweakalizer are better.
> my setup:  zoom g2--digitech rp150--DAED
> DS1--boss dd7--tweakalizer--boss rc20--lexicon mx200--
>  
> i've had the best-so-so results at the beginning
> of my chain, and between the g2 & rp150.
> i had the worst results after the rp150...
> just curious how others used it????
> s---
>  
> 
>