Re: MASTER LIST of Least Costly Live Looping Solutions

["L.Angulo" <labaloops@yahoo.com>]

hey Per,
The more i see performances with it the more i realize that it isnt as bad 
as a lot of people say and is quite suited for the singer songwriter,but 
one thing that did bother me from the little RC-2 (and i am assuming is 
the same user interface philosophy with all the RC family) is that feeling 
of it quantizing you even if u dont want to.In other words can you make 
really short stuttering loops with it?



www.myspace.com/luisangulocom


--- On Sun, 3/29/09, Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: MASTER LIST of Least Costly Live Looping Solutions
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Date: Sunday, March 29, 2009, 11:40 AM
> Hi,
> 
> Probably someone has already mentioned the RC-50? I was
> just working
> with one this Friday and found it quite good. So I thought
> that maybe
> the Loop Station doesn't deserve all the bashing it has has
> gotten
> here for not offering feedback. You can still do a lot of
> fun looping
> with it; three parallel loops in poly rhythm or three
> alternative
> loops cued up, overdub, replace, reverse... And if you turn
> down the
> guide track audio output you can just start looping without
> having to
> follow a click track - just remember to never touch the
> tempo button,
> avoiding the bad time-stretch algorithm to destroy your
> loop ;-)
> 
> Greetings from Sweden
> 
> Per Boysen
> www.boysen.se
> www.perboysen.com
> 
>