[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: using the EDP midi synced as slave
Please get that straight
I dont understand why you would use a _time_ reference where you need a
Tempo and bar/beats/sub beats reference.
midi clock could be better and more stable if the bit rate would be
brought to the today bandwidth standards but its non sense to use a
standard (MTC) that is not intended for Tempo sync
Midi time clock is not Midi clock
Midi time clock just transmits where its at in the song in HH:MM:SS:FF
(hour,minutes,seconds,frames) no tempo,bars, etc
http://www.tweakheadz.com/sync_mmc_mtc_smpte.htm
Claude
Per Boysen a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:56 AM, L.Angulo <labaloops@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> So is there a chance the EDP would respond to those functions if i used
>a sequencer > with better midi implementation?
>
> I guess "better midi implementation" means sending MTC. That's indeed
> better than MIDI Clock but I'm not sure the EDP supports it. Should't
> you be able to record any need MIDI in the sequencer to have it sent
> out into the EDP? Just noticed Andy's reply and hopefully Matthias
> will chime in.
>
> Per
>
>
>